Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit tesla013's column >>

TESLA013

Just this guy.........
Articles Posted: 28  Links Seeded: 0
Member Since: 6/2010  Last Seen: 5/10/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Better the Devil I Know.............

Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:46 PM EDT
religion
By tesla013
Advertise | AdChoices

..... I catch a lot of flak on Vine for my seeming support of Christians or radical extremist Christians. I have been called a "Christo-Fascist" for arguing against the anti-Christian voices. Thought I would clarify a couple of things in light of my ever dimming credibility. First off I am not a Christian by any stretch of the imagination. Besides having been molested in a church by a Sunday school teacher, I use words like @!$%# far to often to be granted admittance to the club. I also have, shall we say certain prejudicial notions about the Christian church. With that said we do share some of the same beliefs:

     Love thy neighbor

     Treat others as you would be treated

     Do not steal

     Do not kill/murder (whatever)

     Don't be coveting your boy's woman..... So on

Good ideas, even better when put into practice every day. I have to have doubts about folks who would cast derision and aspersions on such ideas. I have to wonder what, if anything, they believe in. What do they stand for? The thing I see mainly, here, is they strongly want to persecute those who would live those ideas.

     Today's anti-God, religion, or Christian or whatever one wishes to call it, is in the minority. This was not always so. Once upon a time Christians were an entree in Roman coliseums. They were hunted, killed, and persecuted to the nth degree. Paganism, pantheons and such ruled the day back then. Now Christians have become a majority. Have they lived up to their initial promise, lived by the tenets of their faith? Sometimes. Have they committed atrocities in the name of their God? Most certainly, few religions haven't. Are they more guilty(someday someone will have to walk me through the concept of more guilty) than others of wrong? No, not really. Are there many today who are misguided souls who wish to make our choices for us? Yes. Have they also done good works all over the globe for hundreds of years? Yes. Have many died in that effort? Yes they have. Can anti-Christians name me one group who have done as much for the less fortunate in the past 1000 years? But I listen to the anti-Christians/God crowd, listening for words that will help me see their point of view. But what I mainly see here is hate. They hate God, they hate Christians, they hate all religion, hate, hate, hate. And these folks preach basically the same point of view as those extremist Christians. No tolerance for any way, but their way. They have both of them changed the words you see:

............Love Thy Neighbor; Except in the following circumstances.....

     I can understand and agree with not wanting to be persecuted. I can understand wanting to dissuade todays extreme Christians from this "Manifest Destiny" kick some of them seem to be on. But I am going to need a better reason or choice than hate. And some will say it is not hate. I say bull@!$%#. Some will say it is not another form tyranny, again bull@!$%#. Christmas decorations on lawns? Easter eggs? School plays? They will shout separation of church and state. Spare me the hair splitting. Were the church and state any farther apart, one or the other would reside on a different planet. Kids/adults wanting to enjoy a holiday or play do not a church make.  I have witnessed and read right here on this site, people wanting all Christians to die so the world will be a better place. And the anti-Christians want folks to support and lend credibility to that? But statements like that can provide insight into the ultimate goals and mind set of some in the crowd. After killing all the Christians, and the world is still not a better place, whom will be next? No thank you. I for one do not want anti-Christians any where near power and I certainly will not fight for their official recognition based on nothing more than fear and hatred and a deep seated need for revenge. Better the Devil I Know.

    I recently had an argument here with a pagan. I am assuming they are pagan since their screen name prominently proclaimed it. We were arguing religion, atheism, tolerance, and tyranny. In the course of our argument this person made a statement that, out of respect for lack of permission, I will not quote. I will instead attempt to accurately paraphrase it; I want constitutional protections from being treated as an outsider.For me the underlying thought behind those words are; I want laws passed to make people accept me. I learned further that this person had encountered some problems in their life due to the pagan religious belief. Apparently the were not accepted for employment at some point, lack of Christian values was cited as a reason. Also harassment by law enforcement was attributed to the practice of pagan religion.

    First off those constitutional protections already exist. But as many whose emotions override their objectivity, this person had forgotten that obeying any law is always a personal choice. Next, as I assume this person is a practicing pagan, they are, by today's "norms," an outsider. Deal with it. The wise man blends with the world and prospers. Third, there always seems to be more to the tales of woe than the story teller is willing to share. Naturally I have questions. Does this person wear their religion on their sleeve? Does this person throw their religious beliefs in peoples faces and dare them to take exception? Does this person dress, behave, or have body adornment that folks might find unusual? All of these things will play a role in how one is accepted or not in society. To often today some people seem to feel as if they should be the exception to every rule or practice and that others should not just accept them at face value, but also enthusiastically approve of them as well. If one paints themselves pink and dresses as a clown every day, I doubt they will be getting that public relations position, unless perhaps one is applying with the Ringling Brothers. Fourth an attitude that says one has the right to judge all others, but wish to have laws passed denying those others the right judge in return is never going to fly. If it ever does, I hope off planet migration is available at that time. Again, paint yourself pink, dress like a clown, you are bound to get some looks. Would you have a law requiring all to look only at the ground?

    Finally(alright damn it! settle down or I am gonna find a few more chapters in me) finally, self-honesty is key to a happy or content life, period. When one applies a little self-honesty one generally finds that their list of enemies isn't nearly so long. One may also find that they themselves are at the top of that list. If one wants to practice paganism or whatever(as long as it does not threaten the specie) I am all for it, but one must realize and be ready to deal with the realities of that decision. People are free to believe what they wish, that is right and that is good. But until everyone understands that this is indeed every ones right, one would save oneself a lot of grief, by not necessarily conforming, but by understanding that certain realities must be taken into account to achieve ones goals. Everyone has a tale of woe. Everyone. I was molested at age six by a lady Sunday school teacher. Seduced through drugs and alcohol by a pedophile at 13. Been homeless nearly a third of my 44 years. Want to talk about not getting hired for a job? I have dozens of stories. Want to talk about harassment by law enforcement? I have been sometimes harassed on a daily basis, beaten a couple of times. Welcome to life, it's not just a job it's an adventure. I do not need nor want pity or laws passed. Do I blame God or Christians or those in authority for my woes? No. The older I get the more I realize that blame is waste of time, and a cowards excuse for not moving on. I still practice my religion everyday. Treating others as I wish to be treated. And when I encounter those who believe in cruelty, and controlling others and selfishness? Hey it's my world, I can choose who lives in it. So until the anti-religion crowd can prove to me they will actually live by the words they preach;Live and let live. I will stick with the Devil I know and pray I can help curb or thwart their attempts at tyranny. 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • tesla013's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Newsvine HONOR Vine, The Great Fun House Debate, True Americans
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (115)
tesla013

There are many more facets to this argument, pyschological, social, taboos and so on. But my basic message here is this: I am all for live and let live. I will not trade one form of insanity for another.

I know that abortion and other issues play a role here as well. It is my fondest wish that we remove politics and religion from as many issues as we can. We would be far better served to act on the realities we face than to drag God and the president into each and every one. We are supposed to be the most capable species on the planet. I wish we could @!$%#ing act like it.

  • 18 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:51 PM EDT
Freewill

Tesla - Excellent article my friend, and very well-written! You have captured many of the thoughts and ideas I have had on this topic, but have expressed them much more eloquently than I. I suspect perhaps that I have been unable to make perfectly clear my thoughts in this matter because of my Catholic faith, and my feeling that it might inhibit my ability to be completely fair and objective on this subject. You, and your sharing of your life experiences, have given me broader perspective and have reminded me of what I had forgotten.

You my friend have reminded me that whether one believes in a religion, or believes in no religion, that belief springs from free will and a choice. The degree to which one adheres to, and lives by, the teachings of that religion is a matter of choice. The degree to which one foists ones religion/choices on others is also a matter of choice. The degree to which one listens, understands, and accepts the religion/choices of others is further a matter of choice. Ultimately, how one lives, and how one treats others, comes down to how one chooses to exercise ones free will. In reality, we are all the same, the religious and the non-religious, and we must take responsibility for the consequences of the choices we make, including how we treat those who might make different choices.

I have had a few other interesting discussions on the subject of religion HERE, HERE, and HERE.

I too have had discussions with the individual to whom you allude in your article, and found him to be somewhat unfriendly and exceedingly intolerant of the opinions of others. If treating people in this way is his choice, then he must accept the consequences of that choice. How can one expect tolerance and respect from others if one is not willing to show it in return? This fellow, and all of us, could certainly learn a lot from you my friend, as you have faced a great deal of cruelty, disrespect, and adversity in your lifetime, yet you have still chosen to show kindness, respect, and tolerance for all people regardless of their religion, or lack thereof. You have chosen not to hate. What a different world it would be if we all consistently made that choice.

  • 10 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:27 PM EDT
tesla013

Thank you Freewill. Coming from one I hold in high regard it means a lot. Love and respect do not necessarily mean the same thing but I think the practice of the one leads to the other. As you say it is a matter of choice.

  • 9 votes
#1.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:23 AM EDT
V...

Good ideas, even better when put into practice every day. I have to have doubts about folks who would cast derision and aspersions on such ideas. I have to wonder what, if anything, they believe in. What do they stand for? The thing I see mainly, here, is they strongly want to persecute those who would live those ideas.

You make a leap in logic there... One can very easily share tenets (such as those you mention) with a religion, and yet reject that religion for other reasons. I have known many Atheists (I am not one by the way) who lived MUCH more in harmony with the 10 commandments, and even with the values Jesus preached in the sermon on the mount, than self-proclaimed Christian "followers" do. These Atheists do not behave this way because of a fear of eternal punishment or promise of an eternal reward, but because their internal compass tells them right from wrong. Yet many (if not MOST) Christians will profess the bible to be the literal word of God, and yet live in complete contradiction to it's teachings. My point being, your incorrect leap in logic was in assuming someone who rejects religion, must live their lives in complete antithesis with every aspect of a religion... it is just not so.

I am not an Atheist, and I can still reject religion with all my heathen little heart, and not feel one ounce of animosity towards Christians or Muslims or any other "follower"...

Today's anti-God, religion, or Christian or whatever one wishes to call it, is in the minority.

In large parts of America perhaps... as well as in Islamic countries... yes, religion is predominant... but in the much of the world, Europe, Australia, Japan, China, etc... religion is much less prevalent... or at least not focused on so much.

This was not always so. Once upon a time Christians were an entree in Roman coliseums. They were hunted, killed, and persecuted to the nth degree. Paganism, pantheons and such ruled the day back then. Now Christians have become a majority.

It is worth noting that during the times of pagan religions, Greece, and Rome, etc... the most advances took place in math, philosophy, architecture, etc... and once Christianity took over, there was an enormous repression on science, and any arts thought to be "heretical" ... for centuries people like Copernicus, and Galileo had to live in fear of persecution... it is worth noting that once Christianity took over, it was called "the dark ages".

Are there many today who are misguided souls who wish to make our choices for us? Yes.

That sentence, glossed over in mid-paragraph, is the crux of the issue.
Non-religious people do not want someone making decisions for them, when those decisions are based upon a documented belief system that they find antiquated and nonsensical... non-believers do not mind others making choices for THEMSELVES based upon their beliefs... but in their own lives, they don't want rigid dogma dictating their environment... they want common sense and reason to rule.

Next, as I assume this person is a practicing pagan, they are, by today's "norms," an outsider. Deal with it.

Why do you assume that? Many "pagan" faiths merely see Nature as sacred, and Earth as our source of creation... is that such an abnormal philosophy as to deem one an outsider? Or is that when you hear pagan you envision some guy in a druid kind of cloak and hood divining the future from animal entrails or something?

The wise man blends with the world and prospers.

Hmmmn... I wonder if Jesus would have agreed and just blended with the world of his time?

Do I blame God or Christians or those in authority for my woes? No. The older I get the more I realize that blame is waste of time, and a cowards excuse for not moving on.

I agree 100%

So until the anti-religion crowd can prove to me they will actually live by the words they preach;Live and let live. I will stick with the Devil I know and pray I can help curb or thwart their attempts at tyranny.

Being that one more often sees hardcore religious folks trying to inject their beliefs into politics, and laws, and even historical revision, and censorship in altering school textbooks, (as evidenced recently in Texas), I think that I and many others would find that statement you just made would sound much more accurate with some small word substitution...

"until the RELIGIOUS crowd can prove to me they will actually live by the words they preach;Live and let live. I will stick with the Devil I know (free thought and free will) and pray I can help curb or thwart their attempts at tyranny. "

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 6:15 PM EDT
Extraterrestrial

Excellent article tesla! That's pretty much my sentiments exactly.

  • 9 votes
#1.4 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:24 PM EDT
Virgil Starkwell

Well it's about time E.T. Welcome home.

  • 7 votes
#1.5 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:47 AM EDT
tesla013

V: I asked questions, I did not assume that atheists must live lives contrary to every aspect of religion. You make an assumption then expound upon your own assumption. I merely related what I have seen and read here on this site.

The sentence you speak of is short because it will soon be the topic of another piece. To attempt to address both parties involved in this issue in one article would be whack. Again you assume I will not be following up with a word to Christians.

I assumed the person was a practicing pagan based on their own words in the discussion I refer to in the piece. Again the rest of your comment is assumption and then you again expound upon your own assumption.

Lastly I will not be changing to suit your needs or belief that you understand what I am trying to say better than I myself do. In fact for someone who is not an atheist you sure seem to be at contridiction to your statement. I meant exactly what I said and will not be changing a word.

Thank you for your comments and for coming and reading the piece.

  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:04 AM EDT
V...

tesla013

V: I asked questions, I did not assume that atheists must live lives contrary to every aspect of religion. You make an assumption then expound upon your own assumption. I merely related what I have seen and read here on this site.

Well I did not accuse you of assuming... I accused you of making a leap in logic.
As you are no doubt aware, logic is the formula of... "IF this, THEN that"...
IF you dont eat, THEN you will starve...

Your train of logic went like this... IF folks "cast derision and aspersion" on religious ideas, THEN they "strongly want to persecute those who would live those ideas"... and as I said that is not so.... I understand you are basing your hypothesis on certain individuals that you have been in contact with and questioned, but that is not a cross section large enough to obtain a adequate average, and is really left up to random chance of whom you encounter, and how they decide to answer. From MY experience, even the most rabid atheists whom I've talked to or debated, as much as they ridicule theosophy, they have NO intentions of persecution of believers... They may desire an admission of being wrong from them, but not persecution.... on the flip side of that coin, we ALL see religious folks persecuting others who do not conform to their beliefs... Judgemental verbal condemnation, calls for elected officials to be removed from office for actions they find un-Christian, etc...

The sentence you speak of is short because it will soon be the topic of another piece. To attempt to address both parties involved in this issue in one article would be whack. Again you assume I will not be following up with a word to Christians.

How would anyone know that there would be a follow up counterpoint? I am not psychic...
I am not assuming, you are failing to announce your follow up. But I look forward to it.

I assumed the person was a practicing pagan based on their own words in the discussion I refer to in the piece. Again the rest of your comment is assumption and then you again expound upon your own assumption.

You misunterstood... I did not accuse you of assuming they were a Pagan...
I accused you of assuming someone who is a Pagan is, well, in your words...
"they are, by today's "norms," an outsider. Deal with it." ...

My question was why do you assume they are an outsider? As I mentioned, Many "pagan" faiths merely see Nature as sacred, and Earth as our source of creation... is that such an abnormal philosophy as to deem one an outsider?

Lastly I will not be changing to suit your needs

Don't think I asked you to....

or belief that you understand what I am trying to say better than I myself do.

Didn't say that either... I merely pointed out the flaws in your logic.

In fact for someone who is not an atheist you sure seem to be at contridiction to your statement.

Please illuminate the contradiction... it's not very sporting to hurl an accusation without explaining it.

I meant exactly what I said and will not be changing a word.

I had no doubt of that... Most folks with a religious indoctrination, even if they have outgrown, or let go of certain aspects of it, tend to dig in even harder, when their ideology is questioned...

As Carl Sagan once said...

"In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion."
[Carl Sagan, 1987 CSICOP keynote address]

Thank you for your comments and for coming and reading the piece.

You're welcome, thank you for writing it.

  • 3 votes
#1.7 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:32 AM EDT
tesla013

And yet again another assumption, I have no religious background or indoctrination. Sheeeez V. I was to busy fishing with my Dad to go to church. The few times I did go was for the purpose of being baby sat for a couple of hours.

Actually I mention my intenetion to follow up right here in these comments, #8 actually.

You saying you are not an atheist yet you seem to present your thoughts from that POV.

How many pagans have you run into today V? This week? This year? How many Christians or those of related faiths?

Again I have said what was on my mind. Frankly logic holds little meaning for me in this issue as even debating that which is nearly entirely based on and in faith seems rather illogical from jump. But I am no expert in logic nor do I feel a need to be. Also judging from what little I have been exposed to here on the Vine, logic seems to be based upon whether one uses correct grammar in presenting an idea, which where I am from, is not necessary for folks to understand your words.

Thanks again.

  • 4 votes
#1.8 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:50 AM EDT
V...

tesla013

And yet again another assumption, I have no religious background or indoctrination. Sheeeez V. I was to busy fishing with my Dad to go to church. The few times I did go was for the purpose of being baby sat for a couple of hours.

I didn't actually assume that...
I inferred it from your closing paragraph where you said...
" I still practice my religion everyday."
I think I understand now that you meant you practice your OWN religion,
which is just the more common sense aspects of the 10 commandments...
which is, as I said, also practiced by non-religious folks,
more by coincidence of morality, than by adherance to any belief or religion.

Actually I mention my intenetion to follow up right here in these comments, #8 actually.

C'mon man... I read the article, and commented in thread #1....
I have not read all the comments down to #8 or whatever...
it's unreasionable for you to assume I would do so, and therefore know your future intentions...

You saying you are not an atheist yet you seem to present your thoughts from that POV.

Not at all... I am merely anti-organized religion.
I do believe there is a higher force of some kind,
but I don't think any religion can define what that thing is, or wants of us.
And most religions are so blatantly contradictory, and nonsensical,
they are easily observable as NOT the works of a God.

The only reason I do believe in a higher power, or whatever it may be... is that I had a personal experience that demonstrated to ME that consciousness can and does continue to exist outside of the body... but this was a personal experience, and I would not try to convince or convert anyone over to my way of thinking based on that.

How many pagans have you run into today V? This week? This year? How many Christians or those of related faiths?

Smaller numbers makes one a member of a minority... but not an outsider...
Only the conscious choice of others to exclude, does that.

Again I have said what was on my mind. Frankly logic holds little meaning for me in this issue as even debating that which is nearly entirely based on and in faith seems rather illogical from jump. But I am no expert in logic nor do I feel a need to be.

Well there we agree to disagree... I feel that logic is the key to understanding, and making sense of certain things... and exposing other things that we simply put "faith" into as being incorrect and not deserving of our "faith"... and that goes for things other than religion as well.

Also judging from what little I have been exposed to here on the Vine, logic seems to be based upon whether one uses correct grammar in presenting an idea, which where I am from, is not necessary for folks to understand your words.

I know what you mean.... but that's not where I'm coming from...
Ideas, not word choice, is more important...
But word choice should not be underestimated in terms of conveying intent.

Thanks again.

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:04 PM EDT
Extraterrestrial

As per my namesake I believe in the cosmic nature that the "GOD" that so many belive in is actually the entire universal consciousness of every living being. When we die we become one again with this multi dimensional intelligence. We take our learned experience with us. If we should choose to come back again we start with a blank slate so our past life has very little influence on our new one! After all what would be the point of us coming here to learn if the knowledge of our own existence completely disappears? In a sense you can say our past life experiences are saved on a cosmic hard drive for us to review between our visits to the physical realm.

Call me crazy, but look at the possibilities! My beliefs are just as valid as any religion. :-]

Thank you Virgil for the sentiment! It's good to be home! Death couldn't find me on the trip! But I am sure he is pretty pissed off by now! :-]

  • 8 votes
#1.10 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:38 PM EDT
V...

@ Extraterrestrial

I myself actually lean towards a philosophy similar to that as well... it's called Pantheism.
The basic concept being God is the universe and the universe (and everything in it, including us) is God.

Just as one cell (among billions) in your body is a part of you, that helps make up who/what you are...
It still lives and dies it's own individual existance within you, without you even noticing...

I wouldn't go so far as to say this is my belief, but it is a philosphy I am attracted to...
Much more so than any organized religion's explanation for God.

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:53 PM EDT
Extraterrestrial

V..., Thank you for that word! (Pantheism) Your definition is exactly what I feel is a possible reality! You might like the article I seeded about ET"S influence in ancient god myths! It's the second post on my wall and a good followup for this article!

I feel it explains a lot.

Tesla013, thank you for a very good article! I like the way you tell it like it is! Not many people will tread these waters! My hats off to you!

  • 8 votes
#1.12 - Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:47 AM EDT
tesla013

Thanks ET glad to have you back. Bet you are typing standing up.

V: Wanted to first off thank you for the stimulating debate. One can give no greater gift in this arena, than to cause another to think before they speak, so, Thank you.

The Devil I know is that "Christian" majority by the way. Yes I practice my own form religion, Hell I believe that not believing is a form of religion in itself. But for me the word religion holds no spiritual connotations. Did you take a little trip outside the meat bag? I have similar experiences. I have always felt logic was a polite way to whip a dead horse sometimes. But as I said before I am no expert, therefore not really qualified to speak on it. Seems I made my own assumption in thinking you may have read the comments, apologies for that.

I read the Bible twice when I was a child of 7 or 8. Took some doing to get through all that language. Something I noticed while reading is that certain passages seemed to be outlined in light, while others lay flat on the page. Proverbs was always my favorite. Man wrote the Bible and I think my reading without the influence of some organized religious institution to "Interpret" for me the words allowed to form an ?different? opinion shall we say. Let me end by saying this to you; You would be surprised I think to say the least to find out who I think God is. Yes you read that right. Again thanks, and good luck where ever you may go.

  • 7 votes
#1.13 - Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:04 AM EDT
V...

tesla013

V: Wanted to first off thank you for the stimulating debate.

Likewise.

Yes I practice my own form religion, Hell I believe that not believing is a form of religion in itself.

I don't consider anything a religion until it results in the following...

  1. tax-exempt status,
  2. an official playbook of rules, dogma, etc,
  3. someone wearing a funny suit claiming to be a middle man between you and YOUR creator,
  4. and somebody else giving that guy money.

But for me the word religion holds no spiritual connotations.

Unfortunately, religion doesn't hold spiritual connections for most of it's own followers, regardless of what they tell you... it's really all about conformity and/or exclusion... eternal reward and/or punishment... etc...

Did you take a little trip outside the meat bag? I have similar experiences.

Something like that, but not quite.

I read the Bible twice when I was a child of 7 or 8. Took some doing to get through all that language.

At 7 or 8 that would have been a literal impossibility for me... by choice, and by verbal limitations.

Something I noticed while reading is that certain passages seemed to be outlined in light, while others lay flat on the page. Proverbs was always my favorite.

Actual light? Like... a revelation?

Man wrote the Bible

Many men.... Hundreds of them, over many centuries... And then edited down to an "official" Canon... with many "holy" books being tossed into the waste bin of history.... the editors were also mere men... medieval Bishops... And we know how enlightened THAT bunch was...

and I think my reading without the influence of some organized religious institution to "Interpret" for me the words allowed to form an ?different? opinion shall we say. Let me end by saying this to you; You would be surprised I think to say the least to find out who I think God is. Yes you read that right.

Well that was a teaser... Who?
You can't just put that sentence out there and leave it twisting in the wind?

Again thanks, and good luck where ever you may go.

Thanks, likewise....

  • 4 votes
#1.14 - Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:08 PM EDT
Reply
AmericaRepublic

Well done tesla...the time is ticking, it is only a matter of time before it starts...lol

  • 11 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:04 PM EDT
tesla013

Maybe not. I am not on the bestseller list or anything. Thanks for reading it. I often equate this issue with the racism issue. I have asked the question does one want equality or just a chance to be the master. I have caught hell for having the temerity to ask such things. Strangely enough, I have more respect for the honest answer even if it be one wishes to be the master, than I do for some scholarly treatment of the question that in the end provides no discernible answer.

  • 11 votes
#2.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:15 PM EDT
AmericaRepublic

lol, don't worry my friend, you build it, they will come...lol

  • 10 votes
#2.2 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:21 PM EDT
tesla013

Sounds rather ominous there AR. lol

  • 10 votes
#2.3 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:22 PM EDT
AmericaRepublic

LOL, you are right though, this is in the same category of racism, along with that comes the tempers and the off-beaten path of reason...

  • 11 votes
#2.4 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:24 PM EDT
Reply
Spartan-101

-Tesla-

Thanks for reading it. I often equate this issue with the racism issue.

Good comparison.

Well done.

  • 10 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:30 PM EDT
tesla013

Thank you Spartan.

  • 10 votes
#3.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:39 PM EDT
Reply
Vlad's dog

Howdy Tesla. If only all of us can see that to live together we must accept that others do not need to adhere to the exactness of one persons belief. I grow tired of this constant arguement of who is more right or rightious.

  • 7 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:36 PM EDT
tesla013

Amen Vlad Amen. Thanks for reading.

  • 7 votes
#4.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:38 PM EDT
Reply
northern girl

Great article Tesla! I am agnostic and believe in a "live and let live" way of life when it comes to religion. What I have a very hard time understanding is the Christian bashing. Its perfectly ok to bash Christians, but you better not say anything negative about any other religion unless you want to be called a bigot, racist or some equally silly name most people who use it dont know the meaning of.

Do I know more about the Christian religion than any other religion? Yes. Does that mean I am more comfortable with the Christian religion than any others? Yes, and its for the reasons said above. I know what to expect.

Like it or not Christian haters, but the US is predominately Christian. It doesnt mean you have to be one, but for Pete's sake, quit with the PC "Happy Holidays/Seasons Greetings" instead of "Merry Christmas" bull@!$%#. Would you get snarky with someone if they wished you "Happy Hanukkah"? Would you boycott a store where the clerk wished you a "Happy Kwanzaa"? Big, fat, hairy, stinking deal if our money says "In God We Trust". Or that a school choir wants to sing some Christmas songs at its "Holiday" concert.

Accept others beliefs as you would like yours accepted. Lead by example. Be the better man. And dont expect Christians to give you respect if you cant give some in return.

  • 12 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:42 PM EDT
tesla013

My daughter once asked if she could attend a Hanukkah thingy. Hell I ain't Jewish, but I thought what a great way for her to learn something of another religion and culture so I says sure knock yourself out. You can never expect children to grow if we do not allow them to decide for themselves on issues that will affect them long after we as parents become someone to visit on the holidays. It is why I believe they should be taught about all religions in school as part of history.

The word is petty NG. And IMSHO there is nothing positive associated with petty.

  • 7 votes
#5.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:40 PM EDT
Reply
Spikegary

Hello Tesla,

Excellent article. I have often wondered about the people here that feel they have to insult people that believe in anything to find any value in their own persona. I don't attend church, but believe in God. That's between me and God, no one else's input is required. Seems some are threatened by the most simple of beliefs.

  • 13 votes
Reply#6 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:42 PM EDT
tesla013

Easter eggs comeimmediately to mind.

  • 7 votes
#6.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:31 PM EDT
Virgil Starkwell

Did you know Easter Eggs in Lib-speak translates to, Spring Spheres? There was actually a thread on this a short time ago. I didn't think it was possible to politicize Easter, but the P.C. police managed to do it.

  • 8 votes
#6.2 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:08 PM EDT
Runner99

And then the sign read........The Chicken did it.

  • 9 votes
#6.3 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:19 PM EDT
vol fan in chatt, tn

Hmm, I remember that... Spring sphere - how ridiculous!

Thank you for sticking up for Christians, of which I am one...it's pathetic to see the Christian bashing on NV.

  • 10 votes
#6.4 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:48 PM EDT
Virgil Starkwell

how ridiculous!

What's even more ridiculous, is that eggs aren't spheres!

http://mynorthwest.com/?nid=11&sid=459668

Leave it to the Lib pit of Seattle to come up with this one.

  • 8 votes
#6.5 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:48 AM EDT
Virgil Starkwell

From the above link:

The city's parks department has removed Easter from all of its advertised egg hunts.


http://www.islamicblog.co.in/2011/07/cair-wa-150-to-take-part-in-muslim-youth-leadership-program/

On Sunday, July 10th, the Seattle office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-WA) will host some 150 Muslim students (ages 13-22) for its fourth annual Muslim Youth Leadership Program (MYLP) at Seattle's City Hall. (The event is co-sponsored by the City of Seattle Department of Neighborhoods.)

Kellye Testy, dean of the University of Washington Law School, will deliver the opening speech.

This is typical of the knuckleheaded leadership in this city. I don't know if it's blatant hypocrisy, or blatant stupidity.

  • 9 votes
#6.6 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:09 AM EDT
tesla013

Vol in all honesty I am sticking up for everyone who believes and practices live and let live. IMSHO those who live and practice the tenets of Christianity deserve our support, they do great things for many. There are those however who attempt to claim membership in that group who are not IMSHO Christians by any interpretation of the term. By the same token there are also those who label individuals and groups as Christians, though they themselves claim no attachment to the religion, who are also IMSHO not Christians by any stretch. And in a near future piece I plan to address these individuals as well. I would be intellectualy dishonest if I did not. As I said to Greg down below, I feel that true Christians are far to busy living the life and practicing the faith to give others grief on how they live theirs.

Spring spheres. Would you ever have believed it would come to this when you were hunting them yourself in that oh so distant past?

Thanks for reading the piece and for speaking your minds.

  • 7 votes
#6.7 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:35 AM EDT
Pallas Athene

not true, every Christian church encourages their "flock " too "spread" the word of god, even if the other person does not want to hear it, they are very pushy in allot of cases especially in the south.

It can even be found with relative ease that a main Christian goal is world domination, they want to convert us all, and with so many other dominate religions in the world that will only lead to blood shed, Christians like Islam will never be happy with their corner of the world they want everyone to believe what they believe and will kill to accomplish it. That in my mind is the number one flaw in all religions, none of them ,NONE, have a live and let live ideology but a your views differ from mine*stomp off like a toddler*. Previous posters here proved my point already, why does your religion need to be vindicated by all, why is it terms like xmas and happy holidays insults Christians when the basis for using the "PC" terms is to be polite to other beliefs, as a multi-national nation it would seem we should all be ok with that. No one is knocking Christmas/any other religious holiday or changing how it works when we use terms that keep the feelings of all in mind. Religion should be practiced in private, you guys are the one's bringing it public and demanding we all deal with it because you are the majority. Funny how that works, when the conservatives want something Majority rules and we are a democracy , but when something rubs them the other way they quickly fall to the "minority" rule as we are a Republic not a democracy....typical.

And let's not get into abortion rights and gay marriage as Churches spend BILLIONS each year fighting those,......yeah WAYYYY to busy to give others grief over their life...........................

  • 4 votes
#6.8 - Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:37 PM EDT
tesla013

No not every church Pallas. I know of two in particular that friends of mine attend. I will be addressing the Christian "wrongs" in a future piece. They have some nasty habits today and it seems they have forgotten some of what they preach to others.

Who are you guys?

How can you with a straight face say no holiday is being knocked.

My personal religion if you missed it while reading is; Treat others as you would be treated. Nothing more than that.

By you make the point of the piece well. Assumption and then arguing the assumption does not make it a fact. You have made more than one. You are right in line with the anti-religious I am familiar with, you are all for constitutional rights for all as long as they are only exercised in a single direction.

  • 4 votes
#6.9 - Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:46 PM EDT
Pallas Athene

the best point I made was:

Previous posters here proved my point already, why does your religion need to be vindicated by all, why is it terms like xmas and happy holidays insults Christians when the basis for using the "PC" terms is to be polite to other beliefs, as a multi-national nation it would seem we should all be ok with that. No one is knocking Christmas/any other religious holiday or changing how it works when we use terms that keep the feelings of all in mind. Religion should be practiced in private, you guys are the one's bringing it public and demanding we all deal with it because you are the majority. Funny how that works, when the conservatives want something Majority rules and we are a democracy , but when something rubs them the other way they quickly fall to the "minority" rule as we are a Republic not a democracy....typical.

I realize "every" church is a slight exaggeration, but where I live it seriously is only slight, there are by far more doing as I said than not. It's in the bible , they are "fishers of men" it get's drilled into their heads every sermon they can't really help they are brainwashed.

funny thing how Religions ,even the one's pre-dating christians by 5k years have the same belief structure , more or less, and the same rights and wrongs, their is more similar about religions than different, what's changed over the years is our interpretation of what god is Christians claim to own beliefs of right and wrong that predate Jesus by many a millennium , yet this is the excuse they use to shove Christianity down our throats and we have to take it. Because our laws and founding principles are based on the Christian Belief, that is BS Christianity based itself off religions prior, they can't claim to own morality than any other religion. SO the excuses to why every non-christian American should endure things for the Christian belief structure is bull, we don't owe them squat, without Christianity the USA would still be here with the same laws

  • 4 votes
#6.10 - Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:59 PM EDT
Pallas Athene

How can you with a straight face say no holiday is being knocked.

I think I explained pretty well, I practice the SAME Christmas traditions each year, it does not affect me any to have it called whatever. To the people getting all worked up over a name change I have to ask why, when we know the intent of it? Christmas isn't even a correct date for Jesus's birth , but was created to replace a pagan holiday to help the church indoctrinate more people, yet people treat it as a smack to the face. If I was Jesus I would be upset people perpetuate a lie about my birth but that doesn't seem to bother anyone........... again we live in a secular nation, as Christians being "PC" should be pretty easy, it's what Jesus would do , you know do onto others and all

My personal religion if you missed it while reading is; Treat others as you would be treated. Nothing more than that.

This is a new tactic by fundamentalist , let me ask if you are not religious why you defend it more than my devout friends tend too. I have deep debates almost daily with a school friend of mine, extremely right wing, and even he agrees on the "PC" debate, it's a non-issue that you can get zealots riled up over, a tactic to fire up a dim base that's used constantly. Yet these holidays continue to happen, I know I enjoy each one the same as before.....

Assumption and then arguing the assumption does not make it a fact.

touche , Mon Aime , I was merely keeping up with the pace already set ^^

  • 4 votes
#6.11 - Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:15 PM EDT
tesla013

I defend it because if not me then who? Same as I would defend any ones rights. I got paid for it for it for a time Pallas, military. What I cannot see, and both sides are guilty, is why must one become that which they rail against in order to achieve their goals? Why must we for example remove a manger scene from a lawn at city hall for the satisfaction of a few, while robbing those who enjoy and support the tradition. They say it is a separation of church and state issue, I say piffle, it is childish acting out is what it is. That scene has nothing to do with promoting religion it is simply a tradition. My piece aimed at Christians is tentatively titled Some Words for the Devil I Know, I hope I see you there when I get it up.

  • 2 votes
#6.12 - Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:50 PM EDT
Extraterrestrial

Pallas Athene

Funny thing how Religions ,even the one's pre-dating christians by 5k years have the same belief structure , more or less.

Sorry about that! Our fault! Our technology was so sophisticated back then compared to you primitives. There was no way to control what the primitives at the time would write about us! They got everything out of context! We had to meet some old guy on a mountain and set some guidelines on how to treat one another. And they still messed it up! We figured the use of stone would last longer than paper! And what did they do? They lost the original stones!

We don't know where that character they call Mohammed got his messages from, we suspect he was drinking too much camel urine! We can't take the blame for that one!

  • 5 votes
#6.13 - Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:11 PM EDT
Reply
tesla013

Alrighty then. I must get myself home now. Please try and be civil with each other. Until tomorrow then.

CoH please, or just be adults, they are one in the same.

Moderators please note that I have considered shutting down comments until I return due to the nature of my topic. But in light of my not so exalted status here on Vine I have decided to leave them on. Thank you.

  • 10 votes
Reply#7 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:44 PM EDT
Keithsn

I agree completely with everyhting you've said about how people can get when it comes to these types of arguments. In the interest of fulll disclosure I will say that I am a non-believer. I tend argue mostly when someone from the religious side uses quotes from the bible to tell others how they should live their lives. I am by no means making excuses for myself or anyone.

In saying all of that, I think that most of the arguments that you put forth in the article talking about the hate, etc. that comes from the non-religious, the same could be applied to the religious side. Without naming any people or refernces I have experienced many times when the religious side has acted exactly as you describe for the non-religious side (and vice versa I will admit). Each side has their extremists and neither side is all inclusive and to lump all non-believers or all christians into the category is not accurate.

  • 5 votes
Reply#8 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:09 PM EDT
tesla013

I agree with your assesment about some so called Christians and plan a follow up to address it. Thank You for taking the time.

  • 7 votes
#8.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:29 PM EDT
Reply
greg-709692

I'm a Christian and I can't stand those Christians that get in mine or anyone elses face, just as I can't stand anyone, period, getting in my face about any belief either.

  • 11 votes
Reply#9 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:39 PM EDT
AmericaRepublic

Well said greg and totally agree.....in return my point.

  • 11 votes
#9.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:41 PM EDT
my-pockets-r-mt

And I say;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTdrAt3vReA&feature=related

What surprises me is this is or maybe was allowed in public schools. I know our choir teacher many years ago came under fire for this.

  • 5 votes
#9.2 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:05 PM EDT
owlsview

Religious music has always been a mainstay of school choirs. In 8th grade our choir teacher had us perform, Sweet Chariot, Elijah Rock and the Hallelujah Chorus. I didn't really know what a Muslim was back then. She had what looked like a really dark suntan and a big nose. If you peeked in her classroom window you could sometimes see her on her knees on a rug with her head bowed. Nobody complained about anything. Of course this was back in the fifties when religious tolerance was still tolerated.

  • 11 votes
#9.3 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:25 PM EDT
tesla013

Greg it is my feeling that real Christians are to busy being Christians to get in anyone's face.

  • 9 votes
#9.4 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:42 PM EDT
Runner99

No matter what your religion or lack of religion is, it up to each person to set the example of goodness in what ever the belief. Like my wonderful Dad says, if you lead by example don't be shocked at the results.

  • 8 votes
#9.5 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:56 PM EDT
tesla013

Damned Skippy Runner!

:-)

  • 7 votes
#9.6 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:58 PM EDT
greg-709692

Like I always say tesla, Deeds make the man and/or women, not how many people you can convert.

"Just do "YOUR" Job.

  • 8 votes
#9.7 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:00 AM EDT
Reply
Holly-348328

Very well-written article, tesla! I feel like I know you a little better now. I'm so sorry you were abused at Sunday School. You seem to be on a very even keel, though!

  • 4 votes
Reply#10 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:02 PM EDT
tesla013

Thank You Holly. Don't be sorry I never was.

  • 5 votes
#10.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:59 PM EDT
Reply
Lkessler

Tesla: Totally agree my man. But hey, you know I'm married to an atheist.

Funny, given that when we were younger, my mom taught us to never open doors to anyone when she wasn't home, and often we'd play rock music loudly to scare away the religious nuts looking for someone to talk to.

My sister often yelled: "We're so sorry, you're interrupting our devil worshipping ritual!" You could hear the heels clickety-click-click as they ran away from our front door...

Aww... the good ol' days! *LOL!*

  • 9 votes
Reply#11 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:33 PM EDT
Virgil Starkwell

You could hear the heels clickety-click-click as they ran away from our front door...

They probably would have left sooner if you could have faked the clickety-click of cloven hoofs in the house, with a wisp of sulfur in the air. Of course it could have been punctuated by playing Led Zeppelin backwards.

  • 9 votes
#11.1 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 PM EDT
Lkessler

Virgil: we ruined one too many needles on the turntable doing that! Mom would've had our hides by a thread! :D

  • 7 votes
#11.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:07 PM EDT
Reply
bitemore

I loathe organized religion. There can be no rational justification for it. But... I believe in a higher power, and I do my darndest to live by the Golden Rule. Period. I loathe hypocrisy.

I thoroughly enjoyed your article, because you said very eloquently exactly what I've been thinking. For the most part, anyway. In particular the last paragraph... it should be posted on billboards in every state in the Union!

Well-done!

  • 7 votes
Reply#12 - Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:37 PM EDT
izzybar

Good ideas, even better when put into practice every day. I have to have doubts about folks who would cast derision and aspersions on such ideas. I have to wonder what, if anything, they believe in. What do they stand for? The thing I see mainly, here, is they strongly want to persecute those who would live those ideas.

Wrong, TESLA, "THEY" don't persecute anyone, "THEY" raise objections to those that preach but, themselves, fail to live what they preach.

So until the anti-religion crowd can prove to me they will actually live by the words they preach

It's the religionists that need to live by what they preach.

  • 4 votes
Reply#13 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:46 AM EDT
northern girl

It's the religionists that need to live by what they preach.

So one group needs to live by what they preach but the other doesnt? You do understand the meaning of the word "hypocrite" dont you? All people/groups should practice what they preach.

  • 10 votes
#13.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:55 AM EDT
andrew fortunato

tell me, what is it that the "anti-religious" as you say, "preach"??

  • 3 votes
#13.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:39 AM EDT
izzybar

So one group needs to live by what they preach but the other doesnt?

Not at all. NG, Sorry if my comment unclear.

You do understand the meaning of the word "hypocrite" dont you?

Yes, of course, and that's where I thought I had directed my comment.

All people/groups should practice what they preach.

Absolutely!!! But it is the religionists that do the preaching and the dictating in their efforts to shove their beliefs down the country's throats and failing to live by their preaching, while accusing other of doing that.

  • 4 votes
#13.3 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:51 AM EDT
tesla013

In my experience on this site andrew they preach live and let live. Yet with the next breath want laws passed to inhibit anyone except themselves from living and let live. They feel persecuted by Christianity though how an ideology can persecute anyone is beyond me. They claim that only by limiting one groups freedoms can freedom for all be attained. In my estimation this is simply swapping what they call religious tyranny for non-religious tyranny. And whether benevolent or malevolent tyranny is still tyranny. And in my view nothing positive has ever been associated with tyranny. I would not disagree with anyone who said this is a complicated issue, nor would I disagree with anyone who said that the other side could use some reining in as well. But the way to understanding and living together is not IMSHO by becoming that which one so strongly objects to.

  • 9 votes
#13.4 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:54 AM EDT
tesla013

Izzy can you honestly place everyone who believes or practices Christianity or whatever religion in to the group you call religionists? Does each and every member fit the profile you describe. Or have you simply lumped everyone into a single group of your own making and labeled them? This is one of the things I am talking about. It is fine for you to be able to tie them all together in one group but I cannot for instance ask anti-religious folks to account for an individual who espouses the killing of all Christians as a way to a better world. Nope that person "we" (the anti-religious group) cannot be held responsible for. But any kook out there who claims to be Christian all Christians must answer for. Am I making any sense?

  • 8 votes
#13.5 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:11 AM EDT
Keithsn

Yet with the next breath want laws passed to inhibit anyone except themselves from living and let live.

I'm not sure what kind of laws you are referring to here that the non-religious want passed that would inhibit anyones else's right to live and let live. Example??

They feel persecuted by Christianity though how an ideology can persecute anyone is beyond me.

And yes that makes sense Tesla (referring to 13.5) but both sides do the grouping, it is not right to do so, but that is the case.

Its not the ideology that does the persecution it is the people behind the ideology.

They claim that only by limiting one groups freedoms can freedom for all be attained.

Again, I'm not sure what you mean here, noone is limiting freedoms, people just want to live their lives without having people preach to them about a god that they might not necessarily believe in. But how this limits the freedoms of the religious is beyond me, unless you are referring ot the freedom to preach to people, which could be considered a freedom, but to the people that are being forced to be subjected to it it is not.


  • 5 votes
#13.6 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:17 AM EDT
tesla013

Example: Easter eggs, Christmas displays, singing of spiritual music in schools, attempting through PC to inhibit folks from saying Merry Christmas. And the fact that things of this nature never stop at the stated goal. The stated goal is merely a test to see how far something can be carried. One person is offended by Easter egg, another is offended by spirit sphere, who is right? Or more to the point who should get to decide which term is right? Or do we live and let live? And yes BOTH sides are guilty Keith. I intend to address the other side soon. You see I am not really defending Christians here though it may seem like it. I am trying to defend those of us who will be caught in the middle of the struggle between one group who think their way is best and another who feel their way is best, when in fact neither actually is. In the end it comes to a choice each individual must make.

  • 6 votes
#13.7 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:32 AM EDT
andrew fortunato

not wanting my $$ to go toward something i don't believe in being plopped on the lawn of the city bulding is the same as gays will burn in hell?

who's said you can't put up a christmas display?? just not on the property i help pay for...

as long as my child isn't punished for not participating in the "spiritual singing" in school(s), i could really care less. although, i'm not big on any form of religion is PUBLIC schools.

and i could care less if you say merry x-mas, long as you don't care when i say happy hollidays back...

where exactly am i trying to "carry" this to? how far could i possibly run with this...?

i just think there's a sharp contrast between me saying everything shouldn't be the christian way, and christians saying that everything should be.

  • 4 votes
#13.8 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:22 PM EDT
izzybar

Izzy can you honestly place everyone who believes or practices Christianity or whatever religion in to the group you call religionists?

Never did imply that. However, I do lump all zealots under the "religionist" umbreala.

And yes BOTH sides are guilty Keith.

False equivalency. The objection is to the use of public property to display or advance a religion. Nativity scenes, egg hunts, prayers have 'em all you want. Privately please!!!

  • 4 votes
#13.9 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:59 PM EDT
tesla013

And again I say that folks who want a manger scene pay for that property as well. And hey you don't have to look or listen either. Hell I would enjoy seeing a Buddha out there wearing some antlers or a Santa hat too. My point is, and you both make it well, denying the rights of others is no way to insure yours are protected. Live and let live. It's a Christmas decoration, not a statement of policy or ideology or the advancement of any religion, just a tradition.

  • 8 votes
#13.10 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:13 AM EDT
lib50

I consider myself a very spiritual person and I do not like organized religion. Most of the examples you gave (Easter, In God We Trust, mangers, etc) don't bother me at all, I celebrate like everybody else. I think the problem is that religions (in this case Christians, because as you said, that is the majority) tend to want to make their religion public, be it on money, in the pledge of allegiance, forcing through restrictive laws...) and it sets off some people. And I understand it, they feel like they have to stop the flood. Certain religious folk are currently working overtime to push their brand of theology into our laws and government, and it is not good. I think if religion would do what it is supposed to do and stay private and people would live their lives as examples instead of trying to control others, this wouldn't be a problem. To me if you are secure in your spiritual beliefs none of this would be an issue. I wish we would all live and let live, this is a good seed, tesla.

  • 4 votes
#13.11 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:37 PM EDT
tesla013

Thanks Lib. You brings more good words to this. I plan to follow up with a piece to address the Christian extreme, for I believe that any crusade that only involves a single group of people is a bad one. They will never stop until they feel they have complete control.

  • 5 votes
#13.12 - Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:12 AM EDT
Reply
MWeaver

If everybody believed what they believe privately; and simply followed the "live and let live" philosophy the world would be a better place.

  • 10 votes
Reply#14 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:19 AM EDT
northern girl

Im with you 100% MWeaver!

  • 12 votes
#14.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:33 AM EDT
tesla013

Perhaps MWeaver, one day it wil be so. Tis a worthy wish I think. I am glad you came by thank you.

  • 9 votes
#14.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:39 AM EDT
Reply
andrew fortunato

Love thy neighbor

Treat others as you would be treated

Do not steal

Do not kill/murder (whatever)

Don't be coveting your boy's woman..... So on

Good ideas, even better when put into practice every day. I have to have doubts about folks who would cast derision and aspersions on such ideas. I have to wonder what, if anything, they believe in.

who's saying those aren't good things to believe in?! i would ask why one would have to be "religious" to believe in those things...

and those beliefs have nothing to do with "christianity" seeing as they're the basic tenants of every religion..

So until the anti-religion crowd can prove to me they will actually live by the words they preach

in addition, i would also ask what is it that the "anti-religion" crowd "preach" about?

  • 5 votes
Reply#15 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:36 AM EDT
MWeaver

seeing as they're the basic tenants of every religion

They're basic tenants of simply being a decent human being.

  • 9 votes
#15.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:38 AM EDT
andrew fortunato

this is true...

  • 5 votes
#15.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:39 AM EDT
tesla013

Andrew did you read the piece?

  • 7 votes
#15.3 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:04 AM EDT
Virgil Starkwell

They're basic tenants of simply being a decent human being.

Well said. For what it's worth, the Ten Commandments makes a great deal of sense to me no matter who wrote them, religious motivations or not.

  • 8 votes
#15.4 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:21 PM EDT
andrew fortunato

nope..not really. but i got your basic message, i think, and i disagree.

i don't see how the anti-religion crowd, as you put it, is tyrannical.

  • 2 votes
#15.5 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:27 PM EDT
Reply
boomer 54

Well. Tesla, being a woman, I have a little different take. I feel Christianity has been the single worst thing that has happened to women. In our society as well as others, we are deemed second class citizens(or worse). I resent that.

To me Christianity is always the elephant in the room, just as being black in America has been the elephant. Being Christian (or being white) is the standard. When we no longer require standards for personal beliefs, skin color, and culture, the I think a rational conversation can ensue.

Me, personally, the Golden Rule rules. I try very hard not to be judgemental, but those darn standards creep in sometimes. All the stereotypes and biases have been drummed in my head, and I have to as a intelligent, critical thinking, empathetic, sympathetic citizen of the universe, shoo all those nasty thoughts away...

  • 8 votes
Reply#16 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:48 AM EDT
tesla013

boomer much the same can be said of many religions. Look at Islam for example and their teachings on the place of women in the world. I firmly agree with you that Christianity taken literally persecutes the female, but I also remember that much of the "rule book" as it were was written by men. And for my part can be dismissed as nothing more than humans wishing to rule other humans. It is my hope that someday human kind will stop using religion, either the belief in it or lack of, as an excuse for outrageous behavior. As for a standard, for me it is living that idea; treat others as you would want be treated.

  • 10 votes
#16.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:03 AM EDT
MindieKnows

I have studied the Bible in college a bit, and we did a good amount of studying on the "Pauline Epistles" which next to the 10 commandments is where we get most of our "rules" from. The preachings of Paul who was said to be speaking for Jesus. In his writingsand preachings, Paul had said that Men are the heads of the houses and women ought to please their husbands in whatever way their husbands asked. However, it has been debated that, Paul, actually hated women or rather did not like them. He was said to have been a short, chubby, balding man and had never been with a woman and rather despised them for that. Now how much of that is true, we shall never know. But we should always keep in mind as you said tesla it was written by men. I don't know too many people who would write that they are less than someone else. So we have to take the book with a grain of salt. I mean there is even a section on how a man can tell if his wife is a cheat by making her drink something thats been blessed and if she has cheated she will become sick and die. Really?! lol Like I said grain of salt. If we live by good morals then we should be alright.

  • 6 votes
#16.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:20 PM EDT
Spikegary

Personally, I think much of the bible was written as a rule book for the un and under-educated. I've asked the question before about the prohibition against Pork in Islam and Judaism and have questioned whether it was a religious thing or if it was more about Pork spoils quickly, so someone decided to make it sinful/unclean in the eyes of their God to keep people from getting sick and dying from eating meat that goes bad quickly-as the means of refrigeration say 1000 yers ago (let alone 100!) were prety much non-existent.

I don't necessarily believe that Christianity discriminates against women-I do believe that some of those that profess to be speaking for christianity are working towards their own fulfillment.

  • 8 votes
#16.3 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:39 PM EDT
MindieKnows

Spikegary, that was actually something that we discussed in my class as well! That it was most likely just because pork spoils so quickly. We looked at some crazy laws from the Old Testament like when a woman gives birth to a boy she is "unclean" for 7 days. When she gives birth to a girl she is "unclean" for 2 weeks. This is in Leviticus chapter 12. Why is she "unclean" for twice as long if she has a girl? It's crazy rules.

I believe you are spot on with some christians working towards their own fulfillment but that is like with alot of things. Regardless of religion, race, or gender, most people are out for themselves first.

  • 7 votes
#16.4 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:49 PM EDT
Spikegary

Thanks-I don't think religion is wrong, I think some of it's practioners (all imperfect beings, myself included) is where it runs off the rails. Kind of like blaming a gun for killing somoene. Takes a hand to lift it and pull the trigger and an eye to aim it.

Have no idea on the unclean thing-I never heard of that-I was raised in a Northern Baptist Church-we spent little time with the Old Testament, much more on the New Testament. TYhe enduring message I learned was forgiveness and love is what God is about. How can there be anything wrong with that?

  • 7 votes
#16.5 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:56 PM EDT
Reply
Mary J 0604

"Live and let live." Wouldn't that be nice? :) Great article Tesla!!!! (As always, my friend. :)

I think whining about Christmas trees (or crosses) being up is absolutely ridiculous. Political correctness is also ridiculous. If there is a cross up or a Christmas tree up, GET OVER IT!! I don't get offended if a store DOESN'T have a Christmas tree up, why should anyone get offended if there IS one in the window? "Live and let live" is the perfect statement. If it isn't hurting anyone, then what's the problem? Is it fear? Is it evil at work? Who knows.

Also, offending someone by wishing them a "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays" is also ridiculous. If someone wishes a non-believer a "Merry Christmas", take it like it's meant...."Well wishes." Is that so bad? I don't hate anyone for their non-beliefs so I think one good turn deserves another. :) I don't think anyone should shove their beliefs or non-beliefs down anyone's throat. "Live and let live." is how everyone should live their life. (Unless of course it's hurting someone.) The world would be a much better place. :)

  • 11 votes
Reply#17 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:20 AM EDT
AmericaRepublic

Well said Mary, you rocked with your comment...lol

  • 10 votes
#17.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:22 AM EDT
Mary J 0604

Thank you AR. :) I kept it short. lol

  • 9 votes
#17.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:33 AM EDT
tesla013

It is sad Mary J(hullo how you) that we seem to live in the United States of the Offended.

  • 9 votes
#17.3 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:38 AM EDT
Mary J 0604

Yes it is Tesla. They should change the last line of the Star Spangled Banner to..."The land of the free and the home of the offended." lol

  • 9 votes
#17.4 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:49 AM EDT
Lkessler

Mary: my atheist husband's favorite holiday? Christmas! You got it!

And he says Merry Christmas--not Happy holidays, although he tends to respond with the same phrase given to him (as do I!).

I wonder what I can get him this Christmas that he doesn't already have?

  • 8 votes
#17.5 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:10 PM EDT
Spikegary

Sam's baby Bro/Sis. :-)

  • 7 votes
#17.6 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:18 PM EDT
Lkessler

Gee, ya guys aren't pushing for the baby bro/sis, eh? :D Gary, you're grounded!!!

PS. Plus, it's too late--right now a baby wouldn't come in time for Christmas...

  • 9 votes
#17.7 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:38 PM EDT
Spikegary

That's o.k.-another child is a gift from God (regardless of certain parties, ahem, beliefs) and isn't that what Christmas is all about? So, anytime is Christmas or can be!

  • 10 votes
#17.8 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:41 PM EDT
Lkessler

Oh you should've been a lawyer... You make a good case!

  • 9 votes
#17.9 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:53 PM EDT
Spikegary

Why thank you, lovely lady! :-)

  • 9 votes
#17.10 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:03 PM EDT
Mary J 0604

Mary: my atheist husband's favorite holiday? Christmas! You got it!

LK....That's AWESOME!!!!!

I wonder what I can get him this Christmas that he doesn't already have?

How about this?? ;)

  • 7 votes
#17.11 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:50 AM EDT
MindieKnows

LOL I knew I shouldn't have clicked it, but maybe I can get that for my boyfriend for christmas and he can practice on me LOL

  • 5 votes
#17.12 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:59 AM EDT
Mary J 0604

lol Mindie. It's the gift that will keep on giving!! ;)

  • 4 votes
#17.13 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:49 AM EDT
MindieKnows

and giving and giving!!!

  • 3 votes
#17.14 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:59 AM EDT
Reply
owlsview

In my opinion this is one of the best articles dealing with religion ever written on the Vine. When it comes to being "fair and balanced" Fox News could learn a thing or two from you Tesla.

  • 13 votes
Reply#18 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:28 AM EDT
tesla013

Their ratings would be shot to @!$%# Owl.

  • 11 votes
#18.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:36 AM EDT
owlsview

Yeah, you are probably right. Honesty doesn't sell very well.

Good morning Mary J. our first lady of music.

  • 10 votes
#18.2 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:42 AM EDT
Mary J 0604

Good morning Owl. :) Thank you for the song. :) Right back atcha. ;)

  • 9 votes
#18.3 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:52 AM EDT
Reply
MindieKnows

Once upon a time Christians were an entree in Roman coliseums. They were hunted, killed, and persecuted to the nth degree

Pardon me for not remembering the name, however, I just saw on the History channel (LOVE history!) that there was a boy from a prominant Roman family and he ended up becoming shunned by his family due to the fact that he became Christian. He had hidden the fact that he was going to these religious meetings because they actually would punish these people. It honestly is so obsurd to us in these days because we are so free to do and practice what we wish.

Truely Great article tesla! Everyone has a right to their own opinions, but for antichristians to wish death on all christians is a terrible thing. You are right that every group has done some wrong, and have been mistaken in some way along the journey of their evolution. But as we grow we learn and try to not make the same mistakes again.

As for christmas trees or easter bunnies, I believe these holidays are primarily for our children so a little bit of fun never hurt anyone. Although I am a bit tired of Santa getting all the credit for the good toys!! lol. Again, I applaud you and your wonderful writing!!

  • 7 votes
Reply#19 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:00 PM EDT
tesla013

Thank you. And I thank you for understanding where I am coming from.

And one more thank you about the holiday thing. Now we just need to spread that around.

  • 9 votes
#19.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:06 PM EDT
Reply
tesla013

I have to cut my time short today. My wife has things she wishes me to accomplish today besides the stroking of my own ego. So if you have a question for me or just feel the need to call me silly for my views I will not be here to answer till tomorrow. I have no home computer and do this from the public library. If, however some wish to take up a collection or simply donate a top of the line Dell with full internet and software/hardware package, I could make myself available for round the clock intellectual pistol whippings.(hehehe)

Thank you to everyone for your thoughts and information and praise. Most of all thanks to everyone for proving(up to this point) that folks can have a conversation about religion without the incivility so prominent on many other articles here. You make me proud, and do us all justice. Till tomorrow then.............

OUT.....

  • 7 votes
Reply#20 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:57 PM EDT
Spikegary

Haven't you seen the ads for a no qualifying loan for a top of the line desktop and laptop at low, low monthly prices? I'm sure they are a good deal-I mean they can't lie in their advertising, right? There's lots of really small words for almost 1.2 secods at the end-probably doesn't mean anything, right?

Let me look around-sometimes I can find an old laptop laying around.........

  • 10 votes
#20.1 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:00 PM EDT
Reply
Boudicea

Good article. I enjoyed reading it.

In my experience, the words "tolerance" and "religion" are polar opposites. Whether you are Christian, Anti-Christian, Pagan, Athiest, etc, as soon as religion comes into a conversation, tolerance goes out the window. Everybody seems to want everybody else to believe as THEY do. For myself, I'm kind of with you, tesla - live and let live.

  • 11 votes
Reply#21 - Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:05 PM EDT
tesla013

I agree kj. Thanks for reading.

  • 7 votes
#21.1 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:16 AM EDT
Reply
owlsview

Next.

  • 5 votes
Reply#22 - Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:49 PM EDT
tesla013

I need one more day to put it on paper I have the outline in my mind. This is such a sensitive issue that I feel seeing the words before I place them here is important. It will be thoughts on the Christian radicals who feel that God needs their help in converting the masses.

And check out that V person up top very good convo.

  • 3 votes
#22.1 - Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:16 AM EDT
MindieKnows

tesla, will you talk about Jehovah's Witnesses and Minonites? I think it might be hard doing the Christian radical article. It really depends on what others see as radical I guess. But some are alot crazier than others. Just wanted to let you know I have a brother who is a Witness and we totally don't see eye to eye on his choices or mine if you need any insight or information about their practices for any articles I am full of information on them! :)

  • 3 votes
#22.2 - Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:39 PM EDT
Reply
Libertarian y2k

Well put article and I am in agreement. I am not religious. But I am not fervently anti-religious either. Sometimes I see just as much intolerance from the anti-religious atheistic crowd as I do the religious zealots. Intolerance is intolerance no matter the belief. And as well I believe the anti-religious activists are a religion as well (walks and quacks like a duck then it is a duck). The more intolerant of their group try to impose their will upon us too. I think some have forgotten that we have freedom of as well as from religion. I have issue with any group that tries to impose their will on the masses. Both sides have impassioned and righteous members that have no tolerance for any opinion or thought contrary to theirs. Both have members that "know beyond a doubt" without tangible proof to substantiate their claim. Both sides operate on blind faith in their beliefs.

  • 6 votes
Reply#23 - Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:31 PM EDT
Extraterrestrial

Religion has run its course. It no longer serves a useful purpose in today's times.

If we knew it would create such a fuss, we would never have introduced it to begin with!

By the way.................... Islam............... That wasn't us!

  • 8 votes
Reply#24 - Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:49 AM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com